336.0 to 252.3 MYA
Aviculopinna and Meekopinna are extinct genera of mollusks in the class Bivalvia. All bivalves have two shells. Nearly all have shells that are a mirror image of each other. Bivalves live in both freshwater and seawater. Aviculopinna and Meekopinna are both in the family Pinnidae, which consists of genera that have a triangular pen-shaped shell. The shell has a prismatic layer, made of geometric columns of agronite. These creatures bury and anchor their shells on the seafloor while alive and often become buried in the same position. They can be quite large in extant genera, with the largest known reaching 120 cm (4 feet) in length.
Specimens I collected were difficult to identify when I first started to find them. They are easy to find, typically presenting as a pointed oval shape on the surface of the local Brush Creek limestone. I have collected well over forty specimens in two years of time. I came to know these first using the nickname “sea pen”, as they sort of look like a pen. There are three common genus names in use locally. I often had to decide between Meekopinna, Aviculopinna, and Pteronites. They are difficult to discern using written descriptions, fossil plates, and illustrations.
How to identify genera within Pinnidae
Determining which genus is correct involves a series of visual identification exercises. Growth lamellae (growth lines) are one such visual indicator. They can be nearly non-existent, small, or sharp in the description. Another indicator is how wide the specimen is in cross-section. This may be less reliable due to crushing during the fossilization process. The variation of the triangular shape is another metric used for identification. It ranges from subtriangular to triangular to shape. Some studies record the angle between the dorsal and ventral margins. Nevertheless, identification is difficult with the number of taxonomic opinions that exist. Luiz Anelli et al. (2006) declared that “Paleozoic Pinnidae are in need of a complete investigation”.
Description of local fossil Pinnids
Specimens are narrow, elongate, and subtriangular in shape. Nearly all appear to be missing the broad, oval-shaped anterior portion of the shell. It presents as a narrow, pointed oval in cross-section. This would not provide any protection for the soft parts of the creature, known as the visceral mass. The dorsal margin is straight. The two valves are hinged at this margin. The opposite or ventral side gently slopes wider as you reach the top but is more or less generally straight.
Growth lines adorn the shell. Mollusk shells are secreted by the mantle, which is the dorsal body wall that covers the visceral mass. As the shell is secreted, these lines mark outlines of points while the animal grows. In local fossil Pinnids, these lines are parallel to the ventral margin, then turn sharply nearly 90 degrees to cross the shell and end at the dorsal margin. Growth lines are tightly spaced but do vary.
The outside shell surface is made of a prismatic material. This is a feature on the modern pinna, giving them a shimmer when exposed to light. The nacreous material on the inside of the shell, more commonly known as mother-of-pearl, is said to be the toughest natural material on earth. The inside shell surface where the visceral mass is located contains most of this material. Evidence of the prismatic layer can be seen in the photo below. The pitted look is from a crystal surface of the material. Even today, these 300+ million-year-old specimens give off a kind of shimmer in the light.
Known life situations of extant
This and other members of the Pinnidae live in a vertical, upright position with their anterior (pointed) end, buried in the seafloor. We know a good deal of information about how these lived as the Pinnidae, are still extant. They anchor into the seafloor using byssus threads. Commonly called, sea-silk, these threads are collected today and used to make clothing. The posterior and ventral portion of the shell opens, allowing seawater to pass through so that it can filter feed.
The history of the two genus, Aviculopinna and Meekopinna
To understand how these two genera came into existence, you have to go back to the pair of fossil species named by a pair of German paleontologists. First, the earliest of the two named fossil species, Pinna prisca. Count Georg Ludwig Friedrich Wilhelm zu Münster described this species of Pinnid in 1839, in a publication Beschreibung einiger seltenen Versteinerungen des Zechsteins. Beiträge zur Petrefacten-Kunde (Translated: Description of some rare fossils of the Zechstein. Contributions to petrefactology). His translated (Google Translate) original description follows.
2) pinna? prisca. Taf. IV. fig. 4., from the copper slate with a blown lead gloss from Merzenberg near Milbitz, not far from Gera. This fossilization, which is most similar to a pinna in its outer shape and stripes, was presented with the previous one by the owner, Mr. Laspe, in the geognostic section of the meeting of naturalists in Jena. Pressure and counter-pressure of this somewhat dubious stone are present. On the sides, stripes go down the length, which are cut through by concentric transverse stripes. The shell is extremely thin. From the same copper slate, Mr. Laspe owns a new species of Palaeoniscus, which will be illustrated and described in the supplement to Prof. Agassiz’s great work on fossil fish.
Nine years later, H.B. Geinitz published illustrations of Avicula pinnaeformis in 1848. Geinitz also published in his native language, German. I was able to get the figures and translate the original descriptions of the figures. These illustrations are helpful for genus identification as F.B. Meek would later use these to create a new genus.
H.B. Geinitz’s Published Figures
The familiar oval shape and general appearance of the shells are quite apparent here. Below is a translated (using Google Translate) version of the explanation of Table 14 from H.B. Geinitz’s publication.
Explanation of Table XIV.
Fig. 1. Avicula pinnaeformis Gei. – p. 77. Left bowl, imprint of Gutta-Percha after a copy by Räckingen, Wetterau, in the collection. d. deceased Med.-R. Dr. Speyer in Cassel.
Fig. 2. The same Stone core (steinkern) of the right shell made of dolomitic limestone between Bieblach and Dorna near Gera. (Samil. Pastor Mackroth in Thieschitz.)
Fig. 3. The same right bowl, there, in the same collection, with a transverse section b along the line A – B.
Fig. 4. Lik. left shell from the upper zeclistein von Rückingen, with cross section of the same. (Collection of the deceased Med.-R. Dr. Speyer.)
Fielding B. Meek erects Aviculopinna
In 1864, Sixteen years after Avicula pinnaeformis and twenty-five years after Pinna prisca came into existence, Fielding B. Meek erected a new genus Aviculopinna. He erected it during an era when the science of studying shells was known as Conchology. By declaring this new genus, he helped include several extinct genera within the Order Pteriida. He erected this genus for Pinnids with narrow elongate shells having regular, sharp growth lamellae, and he set the type to be Pinna prisca (Munster) == Avicula pinnaeformis (Geinitz). Interestingly, he did this in a footnote of his article.
A few years later, in 1867, Meek described A. americana and contrasted it to A. pinnaeformis by stating that A. americana possessed sharp, regular growth lamellae, had no trace of radial striae, and a beak more terminal in position.
Yancey divides Aviculopinna, declaring a new genus, Meekopinna
In a 1978 publication from the Bulletins of American Paleontology, Volume 74, Number 303, Thomas Yancey declared a new genus, Meekopinna starting on page 338. He declared Aviculopinna americana Meek 1867 as the type for the new genus. Yancey went to great lengths explaining the current status of Aviculopinna. He explained that two common types exist in Carboniferous and Permian rocks. They have either:
- Growth lamellae that are small, sharp, and regular or
- A smooth shell without significant ornamentation.
Despite this large difference, both types had been placed in Aviculopinna, an all-encompassing genus (Yancey 1978).
Still, pinnids with narrow elongate shells having regular, sharp growth lamellae lacked a suitable generic name (Yancey 1978). So, Yancey created Meekopinna to give this type a genus. He then decided that Pteronites was not available for americana-type pinnids since Pteronites was very different.
Yancey included an illustration on Plate 10 in the publication. He showcases both Meekopinna sagitta and Aviculopinna peracuta. The cross-section of Aviculopinna peracuta is a near match to specimens I find locally.
10-11. Meekopinna sagitta (Chronic) Page 340
10. Internal view of right valve, with external growth lines showing through the valve; note the shallow groove just below the dorsal margin, which is formed by a curvature of the entire shell wall, X 1.5, UCMP 14381, Loray Fm., loc. UCMP D-5609.
11. Portion of an external mold of right valve, showing the form of the growth lines and growth lamellae on the dorsal two-thirds of the shell, X 2, UCMP 14382, Loray Fm., loc. UCMP D-5609.
12-13. Aviculopinna peracuta (Shumard) ? Page 341
External left valve view and posterior view of partial articulated specimen; the anteroventral part of the specimen is covered with matrix; note the thickened dorsal margin projecting above the main part of the shell, X 1, UCMP 14383, Pequop Fm., loc. UCMP D-5540.
14. Aviculopinna sp Page 342
External view of partial left valve, mostly covered with matrix; note the folding of the shell wall, X 2, UCMP 14384, Loray Fm., loc. UCMP D-5606.
Specimens of Interest Locally from the Brush Creek Limestone
Examples of Aviculopinna are very common in the local Brush Creek limestone. I do not find them in any stratum except for the calcareous limestone. They are absent from the shale thus far. Specimens often disarticulate, as natural lateral breaks in the limestone traverse through the specimens. I’ve used Paraloid B-72 to reattach several specimens. All specimens below were recovered in local Brush Creek limestone, within a 1-mile radius. First, I review two specimens preserved flat, not in life position.
A flat preserved specimen, CG-0112
Meekopinna sp. There has been one excellent specimen (CG-0112) that I recovered lying down, not in life position. When the rock was split, I found that the shell material and its growth lamellae were exquisitely preserved. I shared a photo with J. Harper, who has been studying paleontology of gastropods and local geological formations over an entire career. He told me that it was the best he has ever seen from the local section. From numerous photos of specimens I’ve reviewed online, it would appear this is the case.
The specimen is elongate, subtriangular with fine growth lamellae. It appears to be two valves, with the one to the right being more well preserved than the left. This likely happened at the separation of the two halves of limestone. In my opinion, a majority of paired shell valves should be preserved with the dorsal margin separating them. However, these two values are separated by the ventral margin. This is evident by the shape of the growth lamellae, the lines parallel to the ventral margin are near the vertical center.
I only partially prepared this specimen, as I do not wish to risk destroying the preserved outside shell layer by removing further matrix. I do plan on removing some of the extra limestone matrix from the margins using a grinding wheel, to lighten it and make it easier to store. When I discovered this, I did not yet use a diamond cutting wheel on limestone, and the white line to the top and left of the specimen below was an attempt to cleave rock off with a large chisel.
Specimen CG-0118, exceptionally large, maybe from the Pinnidae family
Another specimen (CG-0118), is a very large, flat fossil preserved in limestone. Its fully exposed shape is a shield shape. It may be the posterior portion of a member from the Pinnidae. However, identification is questionable, as it may also be a large member of the cephalopod family. It’s nearly 3-4 times larger than any recovered Aviculopinna I have in the collection. The existent species Pinna nobilis can have shells reaching four feet, or 120cm in length. So I can’t exactly rule out it being in the Pinnidae.
There appear to be preserved growth lamellae at one termination of the specimen. It makes an abrupt corner, at approximately a 60-70 degree angle. It is possible I am looking at the orientation of the whole specimen incorrectly. If I turn my assumption ninety degrees, then the red tube acts as the rolled edge of the ventral margin.
The biggest problem is the size. The photo below shows CG-0118, with CG-0116 resting on top of it. The size contrast is immense. It’s possible the growth lines are from a secondary specimen within.
Other specimens preserved in life position
Life position examples are the easiest to find and recover. They break free of the matrix with ease, in some sort of recoverable detailed shape. The shell surface is difficult to recover, often staying adhered to the limestone matrix. The attachment between calcite shell layers vs the calcite to limestone attachment is vastly different. Examples with the anterior termination preserved in whole can be rare, as they often extend below the limestone layer.
CG-0032, a wide specimen
Meekopinna sp. This specimen is subtriangular, elongate, with preserved growth lamellae along the ventral margin. The shell is terminated in both the anterior and posterior margins. This specimen was repaired from two pieces, reattached perpendicular to the plane of symmetry. There is a bit of matrix extending through the opening in the ventral margin, where the shell was open after death. There are a few areas of topmost shell growth lamellae preserved. Deeper growth lamellae patterns are visible with deep broad grooves on the shell surface.
Specimen is 6cm in length along both the dorsal and ventral margin. It is 4 cm wide on the posterior end, and 2.6cm on the anterior end.
A small anterior piece, CG-0115
Meekopinna sp. The specimen is the anterior section, with a nearly complete terminal beak. The lamellae are sharp and evenly spaced. The dorsal margin is 2.5 cm in length while the ventral is 3.2cm. A small piece of limestone matrix adheres to the ventral side. Removal of the remaining matrix was avoided to preserve the growth lamellae. The lamellae running parallel to the ventral margin come to a sharp point at the anterior termination point. It appears the termination was a mere 1 cm away, considering the angle between the dorsal and ventral margins. The prismatic layer is apparent but does not shimmer excessively with projected light.
The specimen is elongate, subtriangular, and narrow. It has been repaired using Paraloid B-72, with two pieces fused back together. The ventral margin is 6cm in length while the dorsal margin is 5cm. Preserved shell material near the ventral margin shimmers excessively with applied light. There is also a small portion of the shell material that reacts the same near the dorsal margin. Parts of the hinge at the dorsal margin are preserved on this specimen.
The specimen is elongate, subtriangular, and nearly round in cross-section. The ventral margin is 2.5cm in length, the dorsal margin is 3cm. The shell material present shimmers with projected light. The ventral margin is interesting as it rolls up to a sharp lip. The dorsal margin is missing the rolled hinge in preservation. Supporting the near-circular observation, the posterior end measures 1.8cm across the valves and 1.9cm margin to margin. The anterior end is much different, being 1.1cm across the valves and 0.8cm margin to margin.
- 1840, Munster, G.G., Beschreibung einiger seltenen Versteinerungen des Zechsteins. Beiträge zur Petrefacten-Kunde, Page 45, Tab 3, Figure 4
- 1848, Geinitz, H. B., Die Versteinerungen des Deutschen Zechsteinge-birges. Dresden, Page 77, Plate XIV
- 1858, Shumard, B.F., Swallow, G.C., Descriptions of new fossils from the coal measures of Missouri and Kansas., St. Louis Academy of Science Transactions, Page 214
- 1864, Meek, F.B., Remarks on the family Pteriidae, (=Aviculidae) with descriptions of some new fossil genera. The American Journal of Science and Arts, Second Series 37:212-220
- 1978, Waller, T.R., Morphology, morphoclines, and a new classification of the Pteriomorphia (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 248:345–365
- 1978, Yancey, T.E., Brachiopods and mollusks of the Lower Permian Arcturus Group, Nevada and Utah, Pt. 1, Brachiopods, scaphopods, rostroconchs and bivalves. American Paleontology Bulletins, 74(303), Pages 257–363
- 2016, Anelli, L.E. & Rocha-Campos, A.C., Simoes, M.G., Pennsylvanian Pteriomorphian bivalves from the Piaui Formation, Parnaiba Basin, Brazil., Journal of Paleontology – V80, Issue 6, Pages 1125-1141.
- 2018, Dauphin, Y. et al, The Prismatic Layer of Pinna: A Showcase of Methodological Problems and Preconceived Hypotheses, Minerals, 19 Pages.
- 2021. Pinna nobilis, Wikipedia