Order Euomphalida de Koninck 1881
Superfamily Euomphaloidea de Koninck, 1881
Family Euomphaidae White 1877
Genus Amphiscapha Knight, 1942

Common in both locales, these gastropods appear as small spiraled discs. They also resemble cephalopod morphology, often begging a description using cephalopod terms. The whorls are circular in cross-section, but Knight (1934) illustrated a thin section showing the thickening of the prismatic layer at the angulations, or the top and bottom outside corners of the whorl, forming the carinae. The spire is flat to depressed.

Most dimensional specimens free of matrix show a concave spire and a flattened base. Specimens from locality P are preserved in shale, preserving fine details, but are challenging to remove. In contrast, examples from locality K usually fall out of the topmost limestone layers as whole discs.

Most specimens are likely Straparollus (Amphiscapha) catilloides (Conrad, 1842), which Hoare et al. (1997) reported from all of the Glenshaw Formation in the Appalachian Basin. Burke (1962) named another local species, Straparollus (Amphiscapha) elleri, from the Woods Run limestone across the river from Leechburg, in neighboring Westmoreland County. Burke called his new species “the smallest known species of Amphiscapha,” with a maximum width of 1 cm.

Most photographed specimens show a basal view because the matrix often clings to the depression created by the concave spire. It can be challenging to determine which way is up when you first encounter one, but if the aperture opening points clockwise around the axis, you are looking down at the top or spire.

Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal view.
Fig. 1—Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal view. The basal view is easier to capture and clean because the matrix does not adhere well to this side. The spire apex is concave and holds more matrix. A, CG-0532; B, CG-0535; C, CG-0533; D, CG-0534; E, CG-0531; F, CG-0536. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 with a closeup of the juvenile portion of the whorl.
Fig. 2—Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 with a closeup of the juvenile portion of the whorl. A, basal view of specimen CG-0559. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal view.
Fig. 3—Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal view. A, CG-0558; B, CG-0561; C, CG-0562; D, CG-0560; E, CG-05364. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal and dissected whorl view.
Fig. 4—Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445 in basal and dissected whorl view. A, a basal view of a specimen with a small embedded bivalve, CG-0565. B, a broken specimen that reveals the inner details of the whorls. The specimen is upside down, with the apex pointed down, CG-0566. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445.
Fig. 5—Amphiscapha sp. from the Pine Creek limestone at SL 6445. A–D, four views of CG-0570. A, spire view; B, above apertural view showing the depressed spire; C, basal view; D, apertural view. Scale bar = 5 mm.

References

  • de Koninck, L.G., 1883. Faune du calcaire carbonifère de la Belgique, 4e partie, Gastéropodes (suite en fin). Musée Royale d’Historie Naturelle Belgique Annales, Série Paléontoloque 8:1-240
  • Knight, J.B., 1942. Four new genera of Paleozoic Gastropoda. Journal of Paleontology 16(4):487-488
  • White, C. A., 1877. Report upon the invertebrate fossils collected in portions of Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, by parties of the expeditions of 1871, 1872, 1873, and 1874. Report upon United States geographical surveys west of the one hundredth meridian. Volume 4, Paleontology. Government Printing Office, Washington DC. 219 pp., 21 plates. p. 158.